DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR7386-14
21 Apr 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
20 April 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser
N130C2/15U0303 dated 9 March 2015, a copy of which was provided to you
on 18 March 2015, and is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
Docket No. NR7386-14
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
2 Executive Director
f
4
Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0303 dtd 9 Mar 15
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7189 14
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9255 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3471 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket ! NR32471-14 24 Maz E This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of g in executive ses c 5 Your all rdance with admini oO e Yy considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which iis ee Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7118 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/14U1467 of 4 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board found that your orders to VP-45 had a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of November 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6552 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOF nae io 70 SUITE 1001 Dear Thiec i wour annlicratior . sate Ae f ‘ TALS s YOUr application C Ci y if 1 a Y rd and e il Tele - he - = ‘ In ad tt ird cons 3 dered N130C2/15UC of which v provided t Yr at icat mn Has Cl Wel Wil De that the c cannot be syed rea a+ Docket probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0159 dtd 5 Feb 1 No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4191 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C2/13U0816 dated 16 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7121 14
In your own words you state “my recruiter and classifier at MEPS both failed to make me aware of the bonus I was entitled to as per my rate (AIRC), and time of entry.” Enlistment bonuses are not a Docket No. In your case it was not offered and you voluntarily signed up without the incentive of an enlistment bonus. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.